Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

New Immigration Rules laid


Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more


By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

New Immigration Rules have just been laid in Statement of Changes CM 7944. The main change is that the English language requirement for spouses and partners has been introduced, as expected. It takes effect for new applications made on or after 29 November 2010. Those with applications in before that date will have their cases decided under the old rules.

However, a few rather dastardly changes have also been introduced. These only affect small numbers of refugees but, like the extraordinarily grudging changes to the right to work following ZO (Somalia) [2010] UKSC 36, do show that the Secretary of State is not a good loser.

The rules have been altered so that a refugee who has become a British citizen cannot benefit from refugee family reunion rules. The Supreme Court decision in ZN (Afghanistan) [2010] UKSC 21 has been reversed, albeit only for new applications on or after 22 October 2010.

Further, the rules have been adjusted so that a person who entered the UK as the family member of a refugee and has themselves been recognised as a refugee for example through the issuing of a Refugee Convention travel document, also cannot benefit from the refugee family reunion rules. The appeal to the Court of Appeal in MS (Somalia) is due to be heard with a linked case, KI, in a week’s time on exactly this issue. That issue has now been put beyond doubt for applications made on or after 22 October 2010. The outcome in MS and KI will only effect those with applications and appeals already in the pipeline by then.

The numbers of refugees benefitting from these provisions must have been very small. One wonders why the Government is so keen to marginalise these people even more and deprive them of the comfort of being joined by their pre-existing spouses or children. It looks plain nasty to me.

Interested in refugee law? You might like Colin's book, imaginatively called "Refugee Law" and published by Bristol University Press.

Communicating important legal concepts in an approachable way, this is an essential guide for students, lawyers and non-specialists alike.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Free Movement

Free Movement

The Free Movement blog was founded in 2007 by Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers specialising in immigration law. The blog provides updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law by a variety of authors.


8 Responses

    1. I’m not John. He has seen fit to set up another immigration website rather unimaginatively called ‘Free Movement’. For what reason John O only knows. Bloody annoying, unpleasant and rude if you ask me.

  1. I did have a look at the referred to alternative website and was left with blurry ‘aqua-vision’ for quite a few minutes after leaving it. Of course, I would have never confused this freemovement with that one, which is singularly geared towards campaigning against deportations and removals only.

    It’s all a bit of a shame if you ask me… nothing can replace the altogether witty and always relevant bit of commentary you leave at the end of your passages / references.

    I hope you can hold back the military bugler from blowing ‘taps’ for as long as you can resist.

  2. Did not know until now that the alternative website existed. Your readers would surely want to see you in another manifestation.

  3. I’m incredibly sad that you have made the decision you have, however i can understand why you feel tha way you do. Since I discovered your site, I have read it regularly and enjoyed the sometime scathing critique of UKBA. I really hope you will reconsider your decision, even if you come back under another name ;-)

    With best wishes and thanks Suej