Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

“Son of Windrush” QC to oversee compensation scheme as consultation opens


Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more


By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

The Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, has announced that a senior barrister of Caribbean extraction will oversee a compensation scheme for victims of the Windrush scandal. Martin Forde QC of One Crown Office Row was named today as the “Independent Person” who will direct the compensation scheme once in place, as well as advising on its design. A consultation on the operation of the scheme has been launched and will close on 8 June 2018.

The new Secretary of State said that Mr Forde “is himself the son of Windrush parents and brings a wealth of experience in complex public law and compensation matters”. The QC, who took silk in 2005, mostly covers health law, clinical negligence, personal injury and inquests, but also “judicial review hearings involving mental health and immigration issues”, according to a chambers profile. In January 2018 he completed a six-year stint on the Judicial Appointments Commission.

Javid said that

To put things right we need to understand more about what happened, to understand the personal stories, which will help to inform the design of the compensation scheme. As well as receiving written contributions I have asked officials to reach out to the people and communities most closely affected, listen to their concerns directly and, in particular, understand properly how we might address them through a compensation scheme.

The call for evidence asks:

  1. Please can you tell us something about your personal background and what went wrong for you?
  2. How did that affect you, both in practical terms and more generally?
  3. When did you first know there was a problem?
  4. What kinds of losses did you experience, as a direct or indirect result of the problems you encountered?
  5. What do you think we need to do, in terms of a compensation scheme, to put it right?

For background on the Windrush issue, see Nick’s post. A summary of the measures announced to tackle the problem is here. They include a helpline aimed at quickly helping people to get proof of their immigration status, although the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants advises people to seek legal advice (which JCWI offers for free) before contacting the Home Office. It also urges caution in submitting evidence to the compensation consultation.



Relevant articles chosen for you
CJ McKinney

CJ McKinney

CJ McKinney is a specialist on immigration law and policy. Formerly the editor of Free Movement, you will find a lot of articles by CJ here on this website! Twitter: @mckinneytweets.