Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

New Law Society practice note: Statutory defences available to asylum seekers charged with document offences

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

On 10 December 2015, just very shortly before the referral of two solicitors to the Solicitor Regulation Authority by the Court of Appeal in Re Shabani [2015] EWCA Crim 1924 (22 July 2015 but only published late in 2015), the Law Society issued a new practice note on Statutory defences available to asylum seekers charged with document offences. It is aimed at criminal practitioners:

This practice note is for criminal defence practitioners representing clients who have been charged, or may be charged, with document offences relating to their entry into the UK or their failure to have with them an immigration document at a leave or asylum interview.

Let us hope it helps to raise awareness of these defences. Unfortunately, the note does not cover non statutory defences based on the House of Lords case of R v Asfaw [2008] UKHL 31, discussed here on Free Movement. The team representing Abdul Haroun, the man who walked the Channel Tunnel, seem to have been on their toes, though, and are reported to have been running an abuse of process argument.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Colin Yeo

Colin Yeo

Immigration and asylum barrister, blogger, writer and consultant at Garden Court Chambers in London and founder of the Free Movement immigration law website.

Comments