Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Local immigration enforcement

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

I just came across a surprising Home Office press release. Usually, Home Office immigration press releases are recycled and re-used dribble. The ‘new’ ‘points’ based ‘system’ (I’d question the accuracy of all of these words) has been announced again and again and again, for example.

This one might just be a bit different. The stuff about local immigration teams is frankly disturbing. I have christened them Smith’s Home Office Immigration Teams, or SHITs. The Home Office can’t control their people with a highly centralised system, so a devolved one is asking for trouble. There are already too many illegal removals resulting in compensation claims, unlawful detentions and incidents like this. The tone of the press release makes these SHITs sound like some sort of sinister neighbourhood watch, except aimed at immigrants rather than criminals. Who will they be working alongside in local communities? Those who want their neighbour deported? I called the Immigration Advisory Service — a charity that represents immigrants — about a case the other day and had to convince some call centre battery chicken that I wasn’t calling to shop an illegal immigrant before I could get through. It is a sign of the times that they have to screen their calls in this way.

Check out this quote from Councillor Mike Rye, Leader of Conservative-controlled Enfield Council:

“Having a UKBA officer in situ in our offices will be an immense help in all areas of our work – I am really pleased that Enfield Council has been chosen to pilot this new way of working. This partnership will be a great asset in helping us combat fraud, speeding up checks on the immigration status of people applying for council services, and improving the exchange of information between the Council and the UK Border Agency for child protection purposes.”

I thought I’d check out the press release claim that the names of defaulting employers who employ illegal immigrants are to be published on the Home Office website. It’s true! They are actually doing it. They are bravely taking down major players in the international people trafficking business like, er, chip shops and take aways. I don’t see the directors of supermarkets or big food processing companies being done yet. Instead we’ll have small ethnic minority employers being forced out of business, or the SHITs growing fat on fast food and take away protection-in-kind.

The fines are bad news for those concerned – £5,000 or £10,000 a pop. I’d have thought that is enough to put most small businesses out of commission. Well done, Jacqui, it’s not as if there’s a recession around the corner or anything. Putting these people and their employees out of jobs and into debt is really going to help, both with community cohesion and with the economy.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Free Movement

Free Movement

The Free Movement blog was founded in 2007 by Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers specialising in immigration law. The blog provides updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law by a variety of authors.

Comments

2 Responses

  1. Well FM at least there is one axiom of this issue of these interfering SHITs. There is never a danger of this lot being a shining example for the rest of the enforcement sector; as we all know you cannot polish a turd! (or can you?)

    When the National Audit Office come to check efficency ratings of the department does that qualify as a stool sample?

    (I’m sure I left my coat here somewhere?!)

    I’m 1/2 tempted to ring up the HO and report them for employing illegal security guards, do you think they’d prosecute themselves? Especially given the recent HMSP debacle.

    But i’d agree with FM, the 1/4 wit fashion (note less than 1/2 wit) approach is quite clear from this recent incident ->
    http://freehichamyezza.wordpress.com/

    These new guys will probably have all the operational efficency of a dvd-rewinder.

    I’m off to get a takeaway before it gets shut down !

    P.S. without a doubt this is the funniest thing I have read all week!

  2. Interesting to see the adverts on tv at present,regarding the licences required to legally employ non european workers.The advert’s use of ‘hurdles’ implies a deliberate degree of awkwardness and discouragement almost? R.I.P the local kebab shop!