Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Court of Appeal allows deportation appeal of alleged crime boss, doesn’t say why

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

In A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWCA Civ 858, in a rare feat, the Court of Appeal has allowed an appellant’s appeal against deportation but doesn’t tell us why. 

The background of the case is that in 2015, the Home Office decided to deport Mr A, the spouse of an EEA citizen living in the UK. It needed to show that the decision to deport was on the basis of “serious grounds of public policy or public security”. Officials argued that A was the head of an organised crime group, a conclusion with which the Upper Tribunal agreed.

At the end of the hearing, the tribunal “had its attention drawn to further, confidential matters” which ended up being addressed in a special closed judgment. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal based on a challenge to the procedural fairness of the issues in the closed judgment, so in effect we will never know what was said. 

One other interesting point arose which was not directly addressed. The Upper Tribunal said it had to decide whether the organised crime group was still in existence and if not, whether A had the “ability” to revive it. This was challenged on the basis that an “ability” was not enough; it needed to be shown that A posed a “present” threat and had a propensity to act in a way that amounted to that. The Court of Appeal side-stepped this issue but it is an important point which is likely to arise again.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Bilaal Shabbir

Bilaal Shabbir

Bilaal is an Advocate at the Scottish Bar and practises in both Scotland and Jersey, focusing on public law, commercial dispute resolution and offshore trust litigation. He is a Panel Member on the Football Association’s (FA) National Serious Case Panel.

Comments