Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Anonymity orders in First-tier Tribunal and Court of Appeal immigration cases


Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more


By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

Further to the recent update to Upper Tribunal anonymity rules, we now have fresh guidance on the issue from the First-tier Tribunal and Court of Appeal.

President Clements’s note contains this important passage:

10. There is a need for caution where the Tribunal is considering making an [anonymity] order of its own motion, where neither party has made an application. There is a risk that such an order might prevent a party, likely to be the appellant, from discussing his or her case with the media (in some circumstances the appellant and his or her representatives might see this as a desirable step).

11. There has been some concern in recent years that more anonymity orders are made by the Tribunal than are necessary and that the terms of these orders are wider in scope than they need to be. This may cause difficulties for the parties as it is far from clear that the Tribunal has the power to vary or amend such a direction after appeal proceedings are completed… For this reason, an anonymity order for an indefinite period (one that continues beyond completion of the proceedings) should be made only exceptionally and where there is strong justification for doing so.

We have raised exactly this concern, highlighting that the previous First-tier Tribunal guidance lacked fervour on open justice. The new guidance on this point is very welcome and tribunal judges considering anonymity orders where nobody has asked for one should take note.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Free Movement

Free Movement

The Free Movement blog was founded in 2007 by Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers specialising in immigration law. The blog provides updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law by a variety of authors.