Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Commission on a Bill of Rights submissions deadline looms


Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more


By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

My old pupil master, Ian Lewis, helpfully reminded me the other day that the deadline for the Human Rights Commission is approaching: 11 November 2011. With Remembrance Day and International Corduroy Day, 11/11/11 is going to be busy.

The discussion paper for the Commission can be found here.

The cat flap aside, the Tories seem unusually serious about reforming current understanding of human rights laws. Unlike some of his less legally astute colleagues Dominic Grieve seems aware this cannot be achieved through a new domestic bill of rights that would be subsidiary to the European Convention on Human Rights, nor through misconceived interventions in Strasbourg to try and convince human rights judges that the Article 3 prohibition on torture is not an absolute one (that was an embarrassing waste of taxpayers money if ever there was one). These efforts were nothing more than political window dressing. The more serious way forward is through the margin of appreciation.

Grieve took himself off to Strasbourg to argue that signatory states to the European Convention on Human Rights should be allowed flexibility in the way that they apply and interpret the universal principles of the Convention. This revives a doctrine that has arguably never really fallen into abeyance and there is perhaps scope to carve out a UK-specific understanding of some aspects of some rights. Whether that would be a Good Thing or a Bad Thing is of course questionable. UK judges have recently themselves pointed out that the Human Rights Act merely require them to have regard to Strasbourg jurisprudence, not necessarily slavishly follow it.

There are therefore serious issues at stake, and it is worth making your views known. More mature responses than that of the Home Secretary at the Tory conference might be sensible…

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Free Movement

Free Movement

The Free Movement blog was founded in 2007 by Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers specialising in immigration law. The blog provides updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law by a variety of authors.


One Response

  1. So is the deadline 11 minutes past the 11th hour on the 11th day of the 11th month of the 11th year?