- BY Free Movement
Thought for the day
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
“I agree with my noble friend that no area is more complex than the whole business of the Immigration Rules and the procedures surrounding them.”
Lord Taylor of Holbeach in response to Lord Lester of Herne Hill, Hansard, 12 December 2012: Column 1087 (with thanks to Alison from ILPA).
SHARE
Relevant articles chosen for you
Free Movement
The Free Movement blog was founded in 2007 by Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers specialising in immigration law. The blog provides updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law by a variety of authors.
3 Responses
The more startling point lies in the previous point put by Lord Lester of Herne Hill: “My wife is an immigration and asylum judge [Lady Katya Lester] …. she and her colleagues find themselves in a quite terrible situation in trying to understand the Kafkaesque material that flows out of the Home Office. …. it is quite impossible for ordinary men and women, including Members of this House, to understand [them]” During the debate on legal aid Justice Secretary Ken Clarke argued that many immigration cases are “straightforward” and do not require legal assistance. Lord Taylor has now conceded that this is untrue.
..whereas another Lord, Lord McNally, the current Minister of State for Justice was quoted in the Sunday Times a few weeks back as saying ‘Immigration tribunal cases are usually about the facts of a case, not about a point of law, so having a lawyer isn’t usually necessary.’ I’ve asked his office to clarify whether or not he did say this but have had no reply. If he did, perhaps Lord Lester can put him straight as he doesn’t appear to want to speak to me.
Great job Iain. Such ignorance must be confronted head on.