Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
Removals to DRC
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
There have been a few emails flying around amongst refugee lawyers recently about a court-ordered suspension on removals to the Democratic Republic of Congo. NCADC have posted up some information about the situation. In summary, a high court judge recently ordered that a removal to DRC was suspended until after the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal has determined a Country Guideline case on removals there.
The argument that NCADC are suggesting can be run — and they are probably right — is that no other DRC nationals should be removed there, nor should any DRC nationals currently be detained as their removal can no longer be said to be imminent (usually a prerequisite for lawful detention). The determination in question isn’t likely to be issued until October or November this year. Even then, as with other Country Guideline cases, there may well be further legal challenges.
I seriously doubt that any suspension would continue during legal challenges. I am assuming, of course, that the Country Guideline case will go against the immigrant, as important CG cases almost invariably do.