- BY Colin Yeo
Impact of judgments of the Court of Justice of the EU in cases X.Y.Z., A.B.C. and Cimade and Gisti
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
Not exactly a pithy title but looks interesting from ECRE:
The study intends to examine the extent of implementation of asylum-related judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter ‘the CJEU’) and their impact on relevant asylum policies across the EU. It also looks at the role national authorities and the judiciary play in ensuring the application of CJEU case law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (hereinafter ‘the EU Charter’). In particular, the study aims to:
● Assess the national legislative and policy impact of the selected CJEU judgments;
● Identify national and EU-level guidance documents as well as national jurisprudence which interpret the
judgments or key concepts included therein;
● Analyse whether the CJEU judgments are interpreted divergently across the selected EU Member States;
● Examine how the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is used in the selected Member States when applying the CJEU judgments in question.
The study is designed for legal practitioners, academics and decision makers who apply the asylum related CJEU judgments and the EU Charter to their policy, decision-making, litigation, research and advocacy work.
SHARE
