Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Immigration solicitor suspended for falsifying client sick note


Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more


By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

An immigration solicitor has been suspended indefinitely for forging a sick note for the tribunal.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) alleged that Sandia Kumari Pamma had not properly prepared for a child client’s asylum appeal and “decided to falsify a sick note that she had obtained from another client file” in a bid to get the appeal adjourned.

The attempt to hoodwink the tribunal unravelled quickly, as the child was at the hearing and confirmed that he was not sick.

At the time Ms Pamma, a solicitor with ten years’ experience, was working for Duncan Lewis Solicitors as a non-practising consultant. It appears that Duncan Lewis promptly referred Ms Pamma to the regulator upon learning about the doctored note.

At the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, Ms Pamma admitted falsifying the sick note and telling both Duncan Lewis and the immigration tribunal that her client was sick when she knew that to be untrue. She also admitted instructing another lawyer to appear before the tribunal to press for the adjournment.

But the disciplinary panel found Ms Pamma “an honest witness who gave straightforward and credible evidence” and demonstrated “full and frank cooperation from the first point of challenge”. It accepted medical evidence that she had been suffering from a depressive episode at the time, saying that

the Respondent’s judgement was impaired at the time as a result of the medical condition from which she was suffering and the cumulative effect of the extremely difficult circumstances she had described.

In light of this “truly compelling and exceptional personal mitigation”, the tribunal imposed an indefinite suspension for dishonesty instead of a striking off.

In addition for her past work with Duncan Lewis, Ms Pamma also runs a firm called City Law Immigration in her capacity as an OISC immigration adviser. Solicitors suspended from practice can and do work as OISC advisers, as the two regulatory regimes are separate.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of CJ McKinney

CJ McKinney

CJ McKinney is a specialist on immigration law and policy. Formerly the editor of Free Movement, you will find a lot of articles by CJ here on this website! Twitter: @mckinneytweets.