Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Home Office publishes eligibility criteria for children to be admitted to UK under Dubs amendment


Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more


By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

The Home Office has made public its internal guidance for officials on the process and criteria for admitting children to the UK who were living in the Calais camp. The obligation to admit the children comes from section 67 of the recently passed Immigration Act 2016, a section otherwise known as the “Dubs amendment” after Lord Alf Dubs, who proposed it.

The basic criteria are:

To be eligible a child must meet one of the following criteria:

  • they are aged 12 or under
  • they are referred directly by the French authorities, or by an organisation working on behalf of the French authorities, to the Home Office as being at high risk of sexual exploitation
  • they are aged 15 or under and are of Sudanese or Syrian nationality (these nationalities have a first instance asylum grant rate in the UK of 75% or higher, based on the asylum statistics for the period from July 2015 to June 2016)
  • they are aged under 18 and are the accompanying sibling of a child meeting one of the three criteria outlined above

And they must meet all of the following criteria:

  • transfer to the UK must be determined to be in the best interests of the child
  • the child must have been present in the Calais camp on or before 24 October 2016
  • the child must have arrived in Europe before 20 March 2016

The criteria hardly look “soft touch” and are directed principally at younger children.

There is a whole section on age assessment, which has to be conducted where there is no documentary evidence to support the child’s age and age is doubted. A claimed child should only be treated as an adult if properly assessed as such by two social workers or if their “physical appearance and demeanour very strongly suggests that they are significantly over 18 years of age”.

Source: Implementation of section 67 of the Immigration Act 2016 in France – Publications – GOV.UK

Interested in refugee law? You might like Colin's book, imaginatively called "Refugee Law" and published by Bristol University Press.

Communicating important legal concepts in an approachable way, this is an essential guide for students, lawyers and non-specialists alike.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Colin Yeo

Colin Yeo

Immigration and asylum barrister, blogger, writer and consultant at Garden Court Chambers in London and founder of the Free Movement immigration law website.


One Response

  1. I can’t get this in a tweet unfortunately. This criteria is grossly unfair to Eritrean kids. In 2014, Home Office asylum stats show 87% success rate for Eritreans, as good or better than Sudanese and Syrians. The success rate dropped to 48% in 2015 due to Cnut-like Home Office reliance on the useless ‘fact-finding mission’ guidance, but 80% of those appeals were allowed, so in total more than 75% granted in any event.