Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
Fees for EU nationals and others appealing immigration decisions increase over 500% today
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
As of today, 10 October 2016, it now costs £800 to lodge an appeal against an immigration decision where a proper oral hearing is requested. The change was announced on 15 September 2016 and the necessary legal change, the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Fees (Amendment) Order 2016, was laid at the same time to come into effect on 10 October 2016.
The new fees only apply where the decision appealed against was taken on or after 10 October 2016, according to Article 7 of the Order:
the amendments made by this Order only apply in respect of an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal against a decision which was taken on or after the coming into force date of this Order
This means that the cost of lodging an appeal against a decision received before 10 October 2016 is still the old cost.
So, the costs of appealing a Home Office immigration decision are now to be as follows:
|Application for a decision on the papers
|Application for an oral hearing
|Application to the FTT for permission to appeal to the UT
|Application to the UT for permission to appeal to UT
* The date for introducing fees for permission to appeal and in the Upper Tribunal is unknown at the date of writing.
If an appeal succeeds, the Home Office will normally be ordered to repay the appeal fee. However, the waiting times for appeals is thought to be over 12 months at present, so repayment is unlikely to be rapid.
The percentage increase is over 500%. The immigration tribunal is the only part of the court and tribunal system in which full cost recovery is being sought from litigants. It is axiomatic that the impact will mainly be felt by ethnic minority communities.
The proposed exceptions to appeal fees have been very slightly widened to include the following:
- those in possession of a Home Office fee waiver
- those who qualify for legal aid or asylum support;
- those who are appealing against a decision to deprive them of their citizenship; and
- those children bringing appeals to the tribunal who are being supported by a local authority.
- those people appealing decisions to revoke their refugee or humanitarian protected status;
- those with parental responsibility for, children receiving support from local authorities under section 17 of the Children Act 1989 (or any equivalent legislation in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland);
- children who are being housed by a Local Authority under section 20 of the Children Act 1989 (or any equivalent legislation in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland).
It is also possible to apply for fee remission or reduction under paragraph 7 of the original First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Fees Order 2011:
A fee specified in this Order may be reduced or remitted where the Lord Chancellor is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances which justify doing so
The impact is likely to be a sharp reduction in the number of appeals. Potential litigants, many of whom might well have won their cases, will simply not bother and will instead reapply or go underground. There will no doubt continue to be plenty of work for immigration lawyers in a general sense, but far, far less for immigration barristers and judges.
When the Immigration Act 2016 is implemented and immigration appeals almost all become exercisable only on departure from the UK, the number of appeals would be likely to reduce even further. Paying a huge fee for an appeal at which one is not even permitted to be present seems particularly unlikely.
EU migrants are those most likely to be affected by this change; many appeal rights have already disappeared with the Immigration Act 2014 and there is likely to be a huge surge in the number of EU migrant tribunal appeals as some European nationals struggle to establish their right to remain in the UK in their aftermath of Brexit.