Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
General grounds for refusal: understanding re-entry bans
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
The Home Office can impose entry bans on people who have previously breached immigration law or used deception in their application for leave. Bans can last one year, two years, five years or ten years. Generally speaking, and except for some minor exceptions, the person will not be allowed to re-enter the UK during the length of the ban. It sounds straightforward — but the detailed rules on re-entry bans are very complex. This post tries to disentangle them.
Re-entry bans: what periods apply when?
Paragraph 320(7B) says that entry clearance or leave to enter the United Kingdom is to be refused:
where the applicant has previously breached the UK’s immigration laws (and was 18 or over at the time of his most recent breach) by:
(b) breaching a condition attached to his leave;
(c) being an Illegal Entrant;
(d) using Deception in an application for entry clearance, leave to enter or remain, or in order to obtain documents from the Secretary of State or a third party required in support of the application (whether successful or not);
unless the applicant:
(i) Overstayed for-
(a) 90 days or less, where the overstaying began before 6 April 2017: or
(b) 30 days or less, where the overstaying began on or after 6 April 2017
and in either case, left the UK voluntarily, not at the expense (directly or indirectly) of the Secretary of State;
(ii) used Deception in an application for entry clearance, leave to enter or remain, or in order to obtain documents from the Secretary of State or a third party required in support of the application more than 10 years ago;
(iii) left the UK voluntarily, not at the expense (directly or indirectly) of the Secretary of State, more than 12 months ago;
(iv) left the UK voluntarily, at the expense (directly or indirectly) of the Secretary of State, more than 2 years ago; and the date the person left the UK was no more than 6 months after the date on which the person was given notice of liability for removal, or no more than 6 months after the date on which the person no longer had a pending appeal or administrative review; whichever is the later;
(v) left the UK voluntarily, at the expense (directly or indirectly) of the Secretary of State, more than 5 years ago;
(vi) was removed or deported from the UK more than 10 years ago or;
(vii) left or was removed from the UK as a condition of a caution issued in accordance with section 22 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 more than 5 years ago.
Where more than one breach of the UK’s immigration laws has occurred, only the breach which leads to the longest period of absence from the UK will be relevant under this paragraph.
Paragraph 320(7BB) gives more details on what counts as a period of overstaying:
for the purposes of calculating the period of overstaying in paragraph 320(7B)(i), the following will be disregarded:
(a) overstaying of up to 28 days, where, prior to 24 November 2016, an application for leave to remain was made during that time, together with any period of overstaying pending the determination of that application and any related appeal or administrative review;
(b) overstaying in relation to which paragraph 39E of the Immigration Rules (concerning out of time applications made on or after 24 November 2016) applied, together with any period of overstaying pending the determination of such application or any related appeal or administrative review;
(c) overstaying arising from a decision of the Secretary of State which is subsequently withdrawn, quashed, or which the Court or Tribunal has required the Secretary of State to reconsider in whole or in part, unless the challenge to the decision was brought more than three months from the date of the decision.
The phrasing is extraordinarily convoluted but a visual guide might help understand the way the rule works:
Some worked examples might also help.
When does the ban period start?
The ban will start on the date the person leaves UK or, in the case of a ten-year ban following the use of deception in an application, from the date of the refusal of that application.
When do re-entry bans not apply?
Re-entry bans do not apply to applications made under:
- Appendix FM (Immigration Rule A320)
- The EEA Regulations, namely applications for a European Family Permit
- Appendix EU
Under rules 320(7B) and V3.9, those who breached immigration law while they were minors will also not be subject to re-entry bans.
Finally, there are some exemptions for certain groups. In particular, re-entry bans do not apply to those who:
- Were not aware that the documents they submitted or the representations made with previous applications were false.
- Those who have been issued with a visa despite a re-entry ban being in place.
- Those who were in the UK without permission after 17 March 2008 but who voluntarily left before 1 October 2008
- Victims of human trafficking.
- Where a student was refused leave after 1 September 2007 solely on the basis that they made an out-of-time application.
Bear in mind, though, that anyone discussed so far in this section (with the exception of those applying under the EEA Regulations and Appendix EU) might still be caught by paragraph 320(11). This gives the Secretary of State the power to refuse an applicant who has “previously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Rules” when “there are other aggravating circumstances”, such as absconding, making frivolous applications, not complying with a re-documentation process etc. This is a discretionary ground for refusal, i.e. the Secretary of State may decide whether or not to refuse an application on this ground.
Can entry clearance be granted despite a re-entry ban?
Yes. Firstly, and as explained above, those who apply under Appendix FM, Appendix EU or the EEA Regulations will not be prejudiced by entry bans.
In addition, Home Office guidance instructs caseworkers as follows:
You must consider if there are any human rights reasons, such as:
• the right to family life under article 8
• any exceptional, compelling circumstances which would justify you giving entry clearance
You must refer such a case to the referred casework unit (RCU) by using the Home Office (HO) referrals process. RCU will decide whether to give entry clearance outside of the rules
It is unlikely that an application invoking this policy will be successful. The guidance on leave outside the Rules (LOTR) confirms that:
A grant of LOTR should be rare. Discretion should be used sparingly where there are factors that warrant a grant of leave despite the requirements of the Immigration Rules or specific policies having not been met. Factors raised in their application must mean it would not be proportionate to expect the person to remain outside of the UK or to leave the UK.
In practice, if there were exceptional circumstances or the person had a strong Article 8 claim, it is more likely they would be able to apply under Appendix FM, or that they would have applied for leave to remain or revocation of a deportation order when still in the UK.
This article was originally published in March 2017 and has been updated so that it is correct as of the new date of publication shown.