Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Do not lodge Upper Tribunal judicial reviews by post if urgent

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

Following my previous post on Judicial review in the Upper Tribunal someone got in touch with a total horror story. She attempted to lodge a judicial review by fax to the Upper Tribunal. There was no initial response but on enquiry by telephone the next day she was invited to re-send by fax with an undertaking to pay the fee. However, this was a removal case. No written confirmation of issue was given until several days later. The client’s removal was therefore not suspended. The solicitor had to make an urgent injunction application at the High Court. The situation was fully explained and the order granted.

The urgent injunction would have been unnecessary if the Upper Tribunal had issued the application promptly but the the story does not end there.

The solicitor has now been sent a ‘show cause’ request by the High Court as to why she should not be spanked¬†Awuku-style because, it is claimed, the Upper Tribunal do not accept judicial review applications by fax, which she “should have known”. In fact they did in this case and she was told by the Upper Tribunal to send by fax.

Until this all gets sorted out and some clear process guidance is given, immigration solicitors should be very cautious about how they issue judicial reviews in the Upper Tribunal. There is at least one very upset solicitor out there faced with potentially career-ending vigilante quasi-regulatory action by the High Court despite having done nothing discernibly wrong.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Colin Yeo

Colin Yeo

Immigration and asylum barrister, blogger, writer and consultant at Garden Court Chambers in London and founder of the Free Movement immigration law website.

Comments

4 Responses

    1. Wow, this is dreadful! Even though the solicitor was asked to fax the claim? Sounds obsurd! Well I was about to lodge one, thanks for the info Colin.

  1. I am not an expert and might be stating the obvious, but if urgent JR applications are not now accepted by fax (presumably because of the need to pay a fee) and if the Home Office is always leaving it till the last minute to respond to fresh claims before removal, a detainee who wants to lodge a judicial review themselves will not only find it more difficult than it even was before, but impossible?