Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

What are the immigration rules for settled returning residents of the United Kingdom?

A “returning resident” is a resident of the United Kingdom with settled status who returns to the country after a lengthy absence abroad. Ordinarily, when a person refers to “returning residents” they might be talking about a temporary resident who leaves for a short time, for example on holiday or for a visit home, and then comes back again. But in immigration law it has come to refer to a long-term resident with settled status who is outside the country for a protracted period.

A settled resident holds a status formally known as “indefinite leave to remain”, often referred to as “ILR”. This confers on the holder the right to live and work in the UK for as long as they like and re-enter as many times as they like, with no further need to apply for a visa extension. It is also sometimes referred to as “permanent residence” or “settled status”.

The big problem is that it is not quite as permanent as it sounds, though: it can be lost. One way is by the process of deportation. The other is that it can lapse if a person stays outside the United Kingdom for a certain period of time. This can lead to a person who thought they had “permanent” residence being refused re-entry at the border.

For EU and EEA citizens granted “settled status” under the EU Settlement Scheme, the period they can remain outside the United Kingdom before their status lapses is five years. Swiss citizens can be outside the UK for four years before their status lapses. For everyone else, the period is two years.

EU Settlement Scheme: ILR automatically lapses after five years of absence

In acknowledgement of the unique rights granted under the EU Settlement Scheme, migrants with settled status from the EU, Norway, Iceland or Liechtenstein can spend up to five years in a row outside the UK, the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man without losing their permanent residence rights. 

The only exception to this rule applies to Swiss citizens:

If you’re a Swiss citizen, you and your family members can spend up to 4 years in a row outside the UK, the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man without losing your settled status. Your family members do not have to be Swiss citizens.

If they spend more than the maximum number of years abroad, migrants previously holding settled status could apply to return to the UK as a returning resident.

Everyone else: ILR automatically lapses after two years of absence

Normally, where a person with leave, whether limited or indefinite, travels outside the UK, that person can re-enter the UK as long as the leave has not expired. The law covering this type of re-entry is the Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) Order 2000 (SI 2000/1161).

However, Article 13(4)(a) of the Order states as follows:

where the holder has stayed outside the United Kingdom for a continuous period of more than two years, the leave (where the leave is unlimited) or any leave then remaining (where the leave is limited) shall thereupon lapse…

This means that whenever a person with ILR remains outside the UK for more than two years, that person’s ILR automatically lapses as a matter of law. The holder may still have a Biometric Residence Permit, or a stamp or vignette sticker in their passport, indicating that they have ILR, but it is no longer valid.

This seems to be what happened in the case of Irene Clennell, who attracted widespread media attention in early 2017. She was granted ILR many years ago. Her parents remained abroad. She went abroad to look after them and stayed outside the UK for more than two years. She lost her UK status. She entered the UK with a visit visa and was subsequently removed to Singapore by the Home Office on the basis that she was in the UK unlawfully.

Returning to the UK for even a day would stop the loss of ILR, but you would have to know about the law in the first place in order to do that. Many people in possession of indefinite leave to remain quite reasonably assume it is “indefinite” in the sense of permanent. It isn’t.

Immigration rules: Appendix Returning Resident

It is possible for a person who previously had indefinite leave to remain to be readmitted to the UK and for their ILR to be restored. However, there is no right to readmission and it is up to an individual immigration official to allow it.

Perhaps in reaction to the media furore caused by the Irene Clennell case, in June 2018, the government introduced changes to the rules:

…to clarify the distinction between those who have been absent from the UK for less than 2 years and so retain their indefinite leave status, from those whose indefinite leave has lapsed due to an absence of more than 2 years. Those in the latter category must now apply for entry clearance and demonstrate they have strong ties to the UK in order to be issued indefinite leave to enter.

(Explanatory Memorandum to Statement of Changes HC1154, 15 June 2018)

The relevant immigration rules are now set out at Appendix Returning Resident and these deal with former residents of the UK who are returning to live long-term. The eligibility requirements are as follows:

Entry requirement for a Returning Resident

RR 3.1. A person seeking to come to the UK as a Returning Resident must apply for and obtain an entry clearance as a Returning Resident before they arrive in the UK.

RR 3.2. A person applying for entry clearance as a Returning Resident must, if Appendix Tuberculosis applies, provide a valid medical certificate confirming that they have undergone screening for active pulmonary tuberculosis and that this tuberculosis is not present in them.

RR 3.3. A person applying for entry clearance must have previously been granted settlement in the UK which has lapsed by operation of law due to their absence from the UK.

Intention to settle requirement for a Returning Resident

RR 4.1. The decision maker must be satisfied that the applicant genuinely intends to return to the UK for the purpose of settlement.

Previous departure from UK requirement for a Returning Resident

RR 5.1. Unless they are applying under the Windrush Scheme, the applicant must not have received assistance from public funds towards the cost of leaving the UK.

Strong ties to the UK requirement for a Returning Resident

RR 6.1. The decision maker must be satisfied that the applicant has maintained strong ties to the UK during their absence from the UK.

The rules make an exception for migrants who are the partner or child of members of the armed forces serving overseas or certain diplomatic staff, settlement does not lapse for this group.

A person readmitted as a returning resident will have their ILR restored.

It is paragraph RR 8.1, which is crucial as this paragraph allows an immigration official to readmit a person who has been absent for more than two years. A lawyer would say that this rule “imparts a discretion” because it leaves the decision up to the individual immigration official, who must exercise their discretion.

However, as anyone with direct experience with immigration officials will know, relying on an immigration official to be nice to you is not a strong position in which to be.

The predecessor to Appendix Returning Resident was paragraph 19 of the immigration rules which in an earlier version had referred to admission of a person: “as a returning resident if, for example, he has lived here [the UK] for most of his life”. This seemed to steer immigration officials against readmitting those who had not been resident “most of their life.” However, as noted by the Scottish Court of Session back in 2013 in OWA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] CSOH 52, this was always just an example, and it was possible to meet the requirements of paragraph 19 even where the applicant had not spent most of their life in the UK, relying instead on strong ties to the UK.

The rules have now been changed to reflect this, referring to “strong ties” and a “genuine intention” to return to the UK for the purpose of settlement, rather than focusing on whether the person has spent most of their life in the UK.

As well as the rules themselves, there is also guidance published by the Home Office about how discretion should be exercised.

Guidance on readmission of returning residents

The Home Office’s policy on Returning residents provides guidance to immigration officials on how to exercise discretion under Appendix Returning Resident, where a person whose ILR has lapsed makes an application as a returning resident.

This explains the rules in reasonably plain language. The important section for those outside the UK who wish to apply is the “Applications for entry clearance as a returning resident” section on pages 9 to 12. As the title suggests, this outlines the factors an immigration official should consider when deciding whether to grant a returning resident application from a person whose ILR has lapsed.

Strength of ties to the UK

The guidance indicates that the nature of ties to the UK (i.e. whether they are family, property, or business ties) and the extent to which those ties have been maintained during the applicant’s absence should be considered.

The strength of family connection is given priority over whether the applicant has a nuclear family in the UK:

The more immediate the family members are, for example parents, spouse, partner, children or grandchildren, the greater the strength those ties are likely to have. However, relationships with wider family members, such as cousins or nieces and nephews, may also be taken into account if those ties have been closely maintained.

The guidance also notes that contact with family does not need to be in person and that: “Ties on the basis of property or business interests alone are unlikely to demonstrate strong ties to the UK, but can be used in conjunction with other factors to satisfy this.”

Length of original residence in the UK

The general position is that the longer the period of original residence, the more likely it is that the applicant will have developed strong ties to the UK and can be admitted as a returning resident.

However, the length of the original residence must be considered together with all other relevant factors. A decision maker must not refuse an application solely based on a short period of original residence if the other evidence points to the applicant having strong ties to the UK.

Length of time outside the UK

This consideration is described as an “important factor” which must be “assessed against all other factors, including the time spent in the UK before they left.” The previous version of this guidance (Returning Residents: SET 09) indicated that:

The longer a person has remained outside the UK (over 2 years), the more difficult it will be for them to qualify for admission under this provision.

This sentence is not included in the current guidance. However, presumably, it still holds true as a matter of common sense. The longer a person has been away from the UK, the more difficult it will be to argue that “strong ties” have been maintained.

Extended absence from the UK due to COVID-19 pandemic travel restrictions

The Home Office acknowledges that international travel restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic may be considered a legitimate reason for absence:

You should consider whether travel restrictions after 24 January 2020 resulted in unintended absences from the UK. Where you assess someone had intended to return to the UK before their leave lapsed but were prevented from returning by travel restrictions, you should consider this as an additional factor supporting a grant of entry clearance.

Whilst this provision is fairly broad, explanation will likely need to be provided to explain relevant absences and how international travel restrictions prevented return to the UK.

Reasons for leaving and wishing to return

The following reasons for going abroad are specifically mentioned:

  • to access health treatment;
  • to care for family;
  • to retire;
  • for employment/self-employment; or
  • for study.

The guidance does not go as far as suggesting that time spent abroad for such reasons will lead to an application as a returning resident being granted. Ultimately, the reasons for leaving and returning are simply other factors for consideration. But it stands to reason that a temporary absence for a specific reason — particularly a compassionate and compelling reason such as caring for a close relative diagnosed with a terminal illness, or for reasons beyond the applicant’s control such as being posted aboard by an employer — would support the contention that the applicant has maintained strong ties to the UK and intends to live here permanently.

Any other circumstances

This catch-all category allows each case’s specific circumstances to be considered when considering whether a person can meet the requirements of Appendix Returning Resident. Suggestions of factors which may fall into this category, provided within the guidance, include:

  • travel and service overseas with a particular employer before return to the UK with the employer
  • a prolonged period of study abroad by a person who wishes to re-join the family in UK on completion of studies
  • prolonged medical treatment abroad of a kind not available in the UK
  • unintended absences from the UK due to, for example, the COVID-19 pandemic

This guidance is relatively generous in approach and goes far beyond the terms of the rules.

Returning residents and the Windrush Scheme

Following calls by the Windrush generation and subsequent Windrush Scheme, the Home Office announced concessions for those meeting criteria to apply for returning resident permission at no cost. Paragraph RR 1.2 provides that no fee is required for anyone applying under the Windrush scheme.

Eligible applicants outside the UK can consult the Windrush Help Team for further information.

What happens in cases of refusal or limited readmission?

A possible problem is that immigration officials may not know about the guidance: it is universally known and understood by immigration officials that leave lapses after two years of absence. However, it is less widely understood that such people can be readmitted and should be in certain circumstances.

After all, the message from Westminster is that net migration targets remain in place, and action must be taken to meet them. That self-evidently means refusing entry to as many people as possible.

Applying for returning resident visa before entry

From 6 July 2018, a person whose ILR has lapsed has had to apply for a visa to re-enter the UK before travelling. This entails an application for a returning resident visa and (at the time of writing) costs £637. This application will allow all the issues to be resolved before the person travels.

If the application is refused, the person can seek an administrative review of the decision. The possibility of an appeal to the immigration tribunal is not mentioned in the Home Office’s guidance. However, if a decision to refuse entry clearance as a returning resident can, in the particular circumstances of a specific case, be fairly characterised as a refusal of a human rights claim, there would be a right of appeal (see Tribunal finally asks: what is a human rights appeal anyway for further information on rights of appeal).

Applying after entry

In real life, most people will only realise they have an immigration problem once they reach the UK border. Previously, when such a situation occurred, an immigration official would need to make a snap decision on what to do. Often, six months’ leave to enter was granted, allowing the person to enter the UK and try to resolve their position from within the UK.

Following the introduction of the requirement to apply for entry clearance prior to travel in July 2018, it is no longer possible for decisions to admit returning residents to be made at the UK border. Now, if a person who has been absent from the UK for over two years travels to the UK without making a visa application, they will be refused entry and returned to their country of origin.

There will be many people who, having been granted a status described as “indefinite”, remain understandably unaware of the requirement to apply for entry clearance as a returning resident if absent for longer than permitted. Being turned away at the border will undoubtedly come as an unwelcome surprise.

This post was originally published in February 2017 and has been updated to account for law changes since then. It is correct as of the new date of publication, with thanks to Phoebe Warren for help with a previous update. 

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Colin Yeo

Colin Yeo

Immigration and asylum barrister, blogger, writer and consultant at Garden Court Chambers in London and founder of the Free Movement immigration law website.


5 Responses

  1. I’d be quite careful about the “facts” in this case because there appear to be many different versions in different places, all supposedly from either Ms Clennell herself, or other relatives. Her sister-in-law says on the “gofundme” page that she has been “living in the UK for 30 years”.

    The sister-in-law is quoted as saying, “For 30 years, my sister-in-law Irene has lived in Britain after arriving here from Singapore. She has a British husband, two wonderful British children and a granddaughter she dotes upon. She has worked hard for those 30 years raising her family and being an important and beloved member of the local community. “

    But in other places, it appears that what the sister in law said is not true, and that while the marriage has lasted 27 years as a marriage, she’s spent most of her time in Singapore and her husband and children have spent most of their time in the UK.

    Look at the BBC’s article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39099574 which states that she lived in the UK for only 2 years after getting ILR, between 1990 and 1992 and then moved to Singapore with her husband and her sons. They all lived there until 1997. So by 1994, she’d lost ILR.

    In 1998, husband and sons moved back to the UK, wife and mother stayed in Singapore. “Short visits” to the UK. She lived in the UK 2003 – 2005 without leave to remain. She was refused entry to the UK in 2007, but didn’t make another application as a spouse until 2012. And then made one without proof of an on-going relationship.

    http://www.straitstimes.com/…/singaporean-fighting… is another article, that makes it clear she has spent almost all her time since 1992 in Singapore, and her mother died in 1999.

    That doesn’t make the Home Office’s decisions now automatically correct, by any means. But it does mean that all this “lived in the UK 30 years” and “only left to care for dying parents” doesn’t appear to be factual.

  2. If Irene Clennell had lawfully and continuously lived in the UK for at least 10 years, then she is not prevented from applying for ILR under Long residence?

    The Long Residence guidance confirms:

    10 years continuous lawful residence

    This page tells you how to decide whether an applicant has been continually lawfully resident in the UK when considering long residence applications.

    Once an applicant has built up a period of 10 years continuous lawful residence, there is no limit on the length of time afterwards when they can apply. This means they could leave the UK, re-enter on any lawful basis, and apply for settlement from within the UK based on a 10 year period of continuous lawful residence they built up in the past. There is also nothing to prevent a person relying on a 10 year period that they may have relied on in a previous application or grant.

    This reflects the wording “has had” in


    The requirements to be met by an applicant for indefinite leave to remain on the ground of long residence in the United Kingdom are that:
    (i) (a) he has had at least 10 years continuous lawful residence in the United Kingdom.