Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

British citizenship deprivations 2006 to 2015

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

A recent Freedom of Information request reveals the number of times the Home Secretary has deprived British citizens of their citizenship over the last ten years as well as the breakdown of reasons.

The raw numbers were as follows:

YearTotal

2006

> 5

2007

0

2008

0

2009

> 5

2010

> 5

2011

6

2012

6

2013

18

2014

23

2015

19

Total

81

There were two separate legal powers used to effect these derivations. The first was section 40(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981, which permits deprivatation where the Secretary of State “is satisfied that deprivation is conducive to the public good.”

The second was section 40(3) of the British Nationality Act 1981, which permits deprivatation where the Secretary of State is satisfied that the registration or naturalisation was obtained by means of—

(a) fraud,
(b) false representation, or
(c) concealment of a material fact.

The totals were as follows:

Section 40(2)Section 40(3)Total

36

45

81

Given there were basically no citizenship deprivatations prior to 2002 we can see that use of the power has dramatically increased in recent years.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Colin Yeo

Colin Yeo

Immigration and asylum barrister, blogger, writer and consultant at Garden Court Chambers in London and founder of the Free Movement immigration law website.

Comments