- BY CJ McKinney
Revealed: unpublished guidance on detaining vulnerable migrants
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
Lawyers have uncovered internal Home Office guidance on detaining vulnerable migrants. Duncan Lewis Solicitors and Garden Court Chambers secured the previously unpublished documents, which discuss how the Adults at Risk policy should be interpreted and applied, via a hard-fought Freedom of Information request.
The gist of the guidance is that caseworkers should not second guess medico-legal reports unless there are “clear mistakes or errors”, nor “specifically challenge the doctors’ clinical opinion”. The lawyers say that their request for the information was
prompted by concerns that, in practice, the Home Office was routinely failing to treat MLR reports as amounting to Level 3 evidence despite express findings by psychiatrists that detention was causing, or was likely to cause, harm to the individual’s mental health.
A note by Duncan Lewis and Garden Court summarising the internal guidance and how it might be help with detention challenges is available here (pdf). Practitioners can also download the full Freedom of Information response, which includes emails from the Adults at Risk Returns Assurance Team, here (pdf). Contact Lewis Kett or Grace Capel with follow-up questions.