- BY Colin Yeo
Supreme Court to consider relationship between Article 8 and Immigration Rules
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
Some three years after the radical rewriting of the Immigration Rules for families in 2012, the Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal in two important cases, SS (Congo) [2015] EWCA Civ 387 and Agyarko [2015] EWCA Civ 440. SS (Congo) is reported to be linked with the MM case on the minimum income requirement for spouses but I am not sure about Agyarko.
Hearing for SS (Congo) to be combined with #MMcase on 22nd-24th Feb. All of a sudden,three days does not seem enough https://t.co/nufDrCFbMl
— BritCits (@BritCits) December 3, 2015
Permission was refused in:
- Iqbal [2015] EWCA Civ 169 on the Tier 1 Entrepreneur rules
- Dumliauskas and Others [2015] EWCA Civ 145 on EU law public interest deportations and the weight to be given to rehabilitation
- SH (Iran) and Others [2014] EWCA Civ 1469 on the Legacy (now FINALLY laid to rest?)
- Sukhjeet Kaur [2015] EWCA Civ 13 on Tier 4 students and academic progress
An employment law claim based on alleged race and/or age discrimination against the Home Office by former employees was also granted permission: Essop and Others [2015] EWCA Civ 609.
SHARE
