Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Statutory human rights considerations: online courses and ebook updated

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

With the help of a trusty bottle of wine I’ve updated the online courses on Article 8, the Immigration Act and the Immigration Rules (now renamed and worth 2 CPD) and on the Immigration Act 2014 (2 CPD). I have also updated the ebook on the Immigration Act 2014. The updates add commentary and analysis on the statutory human rights considerations in the new Part 5A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 commenced as of 28 July 2014, issues around commencement and the interaction of the newly amended Immigration Rules with the statutory considerations (a very interesting topic in fact). Enjoy.

Free Movement ebooks (not the HJT manual) are available to Free Movement Members for £1 apiece in the Members’ Area. For information about membership click here.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Colin Yeo

Colin Yeo

Immigration and asylum barrister, blogger, writer and consultant at Garden Court Chambers in London and founder of the Free Movement immigration law website.

Comments

One Response

  1. The most interesting question for me is the interaction between the statutory presumptions and Section 55 (which it is emphasised later in the act still applies). Is private life established while an applicant is in the UK unlawfully still to be given little weight when said applicant is a child (and likely had no choice at all about being here)?