Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Review of spouses cases refused on age alone

THANKS FOR READING

Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more

TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER

By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates
Pun intended

As well as formally lowering the spouse visa age back to 18 through a formal change to the Immigration Rules on 28 November 2011 in response to the Quila case, the UK Border Agency is enabling the review of cases where applications were refused solely on the basis of not meeting the increased age requirement of 21.

The announcement on the UKBA news page is here, the new ‘review of age decisions’ page is here, the review guidance here and the review application form here. If you want to see the formal Statement of Changes it is number HC 1622 and can be found here (it is unusually short and sweet).

You can ask for a review using the free application form if:

  • you received a refusal decision under paragraphs 277, 289AA, and 295AA of the Immigration Rules between 27 November 2008 and October 2011 and
  • the application was refused solely on age grounds and
  • both parties are aged 18 or over

An application for review must be made by 31 May 2012. After that date a new application will be needed and the full fee will need to be paid.

The guidance states that where an appeal is pending and the application was refused solely because your sponsor or you were aged between 18 and 20 UKBA will automatically reconsider your case and you need take no action now. I would suggest taking that advice with a pinch of salt and writing to the relevant ECO or in-country team and asking for a review anyway. The danger is that you will get as far as attending court, instructing a lawyer and so on only to find the decision is withdrawn on the day of the hearing, a colossal waste of everyone’s time and money.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of Free Movement

Free Movement

The Free Movement blog was founded in 2007 by Colin Yeo, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers specialising in immigration law. The blog provides updates and commentary on immigration and asylum law by a variety of authors.

Comments

10 responses

  1. This all seems too straight forward. My heart is happy, my head says they have something else up their sleeve. I just don’t know what…

    1. Of course they do. My guess (just a guess though) is that they’ll probably increase the maintenance and accommodation requirements.

  2. hey everyone the ukba website still shows the age requirement to be 21 it is not changed to 18 yet when will it change to 18 please let me know

  3. sorry for asking again but are you guys sure that it will diffently change back to 18 on 28th of this month
    where did you guys red the news can u plz send the link for me if that is possible

Login
Or become a member of Free Movement today
Verified by MonsterInsights