- BY Colin Yeo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4160/f4160434d5a9d42372ca39f21eda5ff5111eb772" alt=""
New tribunal case on burden and standard in refugee exclusion cases
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69a4e/69a4e4ba57a07e297844129a8c3ac15ff0c12f53" alt=""
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
New(ish) tribunal case on burden and standard in refugee exclusion cases. The official headnote:
In every case involving exclusion of protection under Article 1F of the Refugee Convention, the onus of proof is on the Secretary of State, a detailed and individualised examination of the facts is required, there must be clear and credible evidence of the offending conduct, and the overall evaluative judgment involves the application of a standard higher than suspicion or belief.
Source: Al – Sirri (Asylum – Exclusion – Article 1F(c)) Egypt [2016] UKUT 448 (IAC) (17 August 2016)
SHARE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06246/06246b68699a96f7d024d8c5dd120847edbc5738" alt="Picture of Colin Yeo"