- BY Sonia Lenegan
National Audit Office report on Homes for Ukraine scheme
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
The National Audit Office has today published a report ‘Investigation into the Homes for Ukraine scheme’, looking at what has been achieved to date, for what cost and what can be learned from the scheme. As indicated, the report looks only at the Home for Ukraine scheme and it does not make recommendations but does set out some key findings. Homelessness is a growing concern, as set out in the press release:
Homelessness data is incomplete, but up until 31 August 2023, 4,890 households (8% of total estimated households that had arrived on the scheme in England at that time) have been assessed by a local authority as being at risk of homelessness or being homeless. This likely understates the true picture, as approximately one third of local authorities are not providing homelessness data to DLUHC and the risk of homelessness is likely to increase, as sponsorships end.
Although safeguarding is recognised by the Department for Levelling Up, Communities and Housing as one of the biggest potential risks of the scheme, the department “does not know the true number of safeguarding checks that were failed”. The report also states that there is ongoing uncertainty in relation to funding for the scheme and also for the people granted leave at the current end of the scheme in 2025.
Overall, there is much that the government can be commended for in the implementation of the scheme but the issues around homelessness and safeguarding are serious and the lack of data concerning.