Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law

Fast-track age assessments of newly arrived asylum seekers were unlawful


Older content is locked

A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more


By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;

  • Single login for personal use
  • FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
  • Access to all Free Movement blog content
  • Access to all our online training materials
  • Access to our busy forums
  • Downloadable CPD certificates

Fast-track age assessments for newly arrived asylum seekers were unlawful, the High Court has found. The case is R (MA & Anor) v Coventry City Council & Anor [2022] EWHC 98 (Admin). Doughty Street Chambers has a detailed summary and Diane Taylor has written it up for the Guardian as well.

The challenge was to a Home Office policy — now abandoned — on procedures for deciding whether people freshly arrived across the Channel were over or under 18. The department hired its own social workers to carry out quick-fire age assessments — rather than the carefully calibrated Merton” process — where the person claimed to be a child but there was “reason to doubt the claimant’s age”.

Mr Justice Henshaw said there was “no objection in principle” to the Home Office employing its own social workers. But assessments of new arrivals who aren’t very obviously over 18 need to include the well-established Merton safeguards:

… in my view it is inconsistent with the principles set out in the case law, including the need to conduct a fair and careful assessment, to seek to assess age in a non-obvious case… in circumstances where an individual who has just arrived at the UK and been detained (i) does not have the support of an appropriate adult and (ii) is not given a ‘minded to’ opportunity.

As a result, the withdrawn guidance, the individual assessments challenged and any lengthening of detention to carry them out were all unlawful. Enver Solomon of the Refugee Council called the decision a “big strategic legal victory”.

Interested in refugee law? You might like Colin's book, imaginatively called "Refugee Law" and published by Bristol University Press.

Communicating important legal concepts in an approachable way, this is an essential guide for students, lawyers and non-specialists alike.

Relevant articles chosen for you
Picture of CJ McKinney

CJ McKinney

CJ McKinney is a specialist on immigration law and policy. Formerly the editor of Free Movement, you will find a lot of articles by CJ here on this website! Twitter: @mckinneytweets.