Fee waivers for applications made outside the UK: who can qualify and how to apply

Fee waivers (meaning that the application can be made without paying the fee) are available for people who are outside the UK and who are making certain types of entry clearance applications but cannot afford the fee. This is important as the fees are set at a level that is too expensive for many families and may otherwise prevent them from applying. We have a separate briefing on in-country fee waivers.

The Home Office has published guidance on fee waivers for entry clearance applications and the application form is here. The guidance was published following a concession made by the Home Secretary that the existing policy was unlawful. The Home Office’s position used to be that discretion to waive fees would be exercised in “exceptional circumstances only, such as civil war or natural disaster”. Now, the guidance emphasises that the test is affordability, and whether the applicant and their sponsor “do not have sufficient funds at their disposal, after meeting their essential living needs, to pay the fee”.

Who can qualify for a fee waiver?

This fee waiver is only available to those who are applying to come to the UK on the basis of their right to family or private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The guidance says that:

Applicants will only be granted a fee waiver on the basis of their Article 8 ECHR rights in cases where the underlying human rights claim on which they rely forms a substantive basis of their application.

They must be applying under one of the following routes:

• as a partner or child of a member of HM Forces
• as a partner or child of a member of HM Forces (the sponsor) where the sponsor:
  • is a foreign or Commonwealth member of HM Forces
  • has at least 4 years’ service in HM Forces at the date of application
• under Appendix FM (family members) where the sponsor is present and settled in the UK
• by having refugee or humanitarian protection status in the UK

Note that the guidance unhelpfully refers to paragraphs of the rules that have since been deleted and replaced by Appendix HM Armed Forces. According to the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration’s recent inspection of fee waivers, a new version of the guidance was expected in January 2025.

As with in-country fee waivers, it is possible to ask for a fee waiver for some or all dependants, as well as the main applicant. What is not possible is paying part of the application fee and having the rest waived. So if someone cannot afford the entire fee, then it should be waived in full. It is however possible to get a fee waiver in respect of the immigration health surcharge only, if the person can afford the application fee but not the surcharge.

The guidance explicitly states that the outcome of a fee waiver application is not a barrier to entry to the UK. That’s important because some people may worry that making such an application could in itself, affect their entry clearance application. In principle, they are completely separate.

People who have been subject to transnational marriage abandonment and are applying for entry clearance under Appendix Victim of Domestic Abuse can also apply for a fee waiver which we have covered separately.

What are the criteria for getting a fee waiver?

Applicants will be granted a fee waiver if either:

1. they can credibly demonstrate that they cannot afford the fee
2. their income is not sufficient to meet their child’s needs

In terms of the fee itself, it’s worth noting that entry clearance applications are paid for in foreign currency depending on the location of the applicant. There is a gov.uk tool which allows you to see which currency the Home Office uses in which country. The Home Office exchange rate is set at 4% above the Oanda live bid rates.

Affordability is described as “when the applicant and sponsor do not have sufficient funds at their disposal, after meeting their essential living needs, to pay the fee”. As this suggests, the finances of both the sponsor and the applicant will be assessed. There is a list of questions at pages 13 to 15 of the guidance which will be used to consider affordability.

“Essential living needs” is obviously a term of importance here. It is stated to include

housing or accommodation and utilities, food, clothing, toiletries, non-prescription medication and household cleaning items. It would also include the costs of travel and communication to enable the supported persons to maintain interpersonal relationships and access a reasonable level of social, cultural and religious life.

Concerningly, the guidance links to the report on cash allowances paid to people seeking asylum, as a benchmark for the weekly cost of essential living needs. The standard weekly allowance paid is £49.18. That is obviously insufficient to cover people’s essential living needs, regardless of what the government’s report concluded.

That said, the same reference to asylum support is included in the policies on in-country fee waivers and making a change of conditions application for recourse to public funds. In practice, successful applications are routinely made where the cost of essential living needs far exceeds the level of asylum support. So this should not deter people from applying for waivers, and the guidance does say that caseworkers should consider whether the costs are “reasonable”.

This issue of the use of asylum support as a benchmark was expressly addressed in the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration’s inspection of the Home Office’s management of fee waivers published in March 2025. It seems that although it is still in the guidance, the asylum support rates are not being used as a benchmark in practice and the report notes at 8.11 that:

An operational manager responsible for in-country fee waivers told inspectors that policy advised them that the asylum support rates were “outdated”. However, a policy officer responsible for in-country and overseas fee waiver guidance told inspectors that they suspected the move away from the use of the asylum support payment rates by operational teams when assessing affordability was because “something that had evolved.”

There is always the risk that a decision maker will be unaware of this and may use the guidance as written, so I have started referring to this section of the inspector’s report in my representations in support of a fee waiver.

The guidance also sets out the section 55 duty to consider the best interests of a child when making the decision. Interestingly, it states that caseworkers must consider “whether the impact on the child would be significant”: similar wording to that in the change of conditions guidance, which was held to be unlawful.

Also a cause for concern is the possibility of rejection where “either insufficient efforts have been made to save for the fee or if the applicant’s need to travel to the UK is not urgent and they and the sponsor could save for the fee in the coming months”. Saving for the fee is referenced at least 25 times in this guidance, but there is far less emphasis on this in the in-country equivalent, which is an important difference to be aware of if you are used to making the in-country applications.

It appears that people deemed to have a reasonable amount of disposable income will be expected to have tried saving over the past six months or face rejection. Caseworkers will also look at future ability to save: if they think that the applicant and sponsor would be able to save up the fee “in the next few months” and there is no urgent need to travel, then the application may be rejected.

Officials are instructed that they should also “consider whether saving over a long period of time, for example 2 years, is reasonable”. It is very difficult to envisage any circumstances where it is appropriate to keep a family separated for a further two years – even the guidance suggests it may well be “excessive” – but we will need to wait and see what lengths of time are cited in refusals.

The caseworker will also determine whether the applicant and sponsor have “intentionally disposed of funds”. This can include where they or their dependants are:

• providing support or loans to others without any detail as to how these are being applied
• voluntarily giving funds away to a third party
• paying debts before they are required to do so or paying more in response to a debt than is required
• buying a personal possession that is clearly not essential to their living needs
• spending extravagantly or excessively

As is always the case with these applications (for both fee waiver and change of conditions), it is very important to put in robust representations explaining in a lot of detail the finances of the applicant and sponsor. These are incredibly time-consuming applications and if a legal aid lawyer is available to assist (a big if) then trying to secure exceptional case funding should be considered where people are eligible for this.      

What kind of evidence is expected?

Both the applicant and the sponsor will need to provide evidence of their financial circumstances to cover the six month period before the fee waiver application. The guidance states that caseworkers will expect to see information and evidence relating to:

• the applicant’s and sponsor’s income
• their accommodation
• the type and adequacy of accommodation
• the amount of their rent/mortgage or of their contribution towards this
• their outgoings in terms of spending on things like food and utility bills

Evidence will therefore include, but is not limited to, pay slips, bank statements, tenancy agreements and utility bills. Where support is being provided by family or friends, by central or local government or a charity, a letter of support will be needed detailing the nature and amount of the support provided. If applicable, this should include an explanation of why support will not be continuing. The guidance accepts that providing this evidence from friends and families may be more difficult for some people, and in those circumstances they will consider the credibility of the account provided by the applicant.

Where the applicant, the sponsor or a dependent family member has a physical or mental disability, and it is relevant to their finances, independent documentary evidence such as a letter from a doctor should be provided.

Where documents are not in English or Welsh, they must be provided both in the original language and with a full translation that can be independently verified. Figures provided in the online form “must be provided in Great British Pounds (GBP). To convert monetary amounts from other currencies into GBP, use the currency converter provided by OANDA”.

Evidential flexibility in relation to missing evidence can be applied in exceptional circumstances, for example where the other evidence is clear and compelling.

What happens after the application is decided?

If a fee waiver is granted, the applicant will be sent a code to use when making their online entry clearance application. This must be submitted within 28 calendar days of the date of the fee waiver decision. Biometrics (fingerprints and photograph) must then be submitted as usual in order for the application to be valid, otherwise the process may need to be started from scratch.

If refused, there is no right of appeal or reconsideration process available. Lawyers advising in such cases will need to consider appropriate next steps, including whether to put in a fresh application or to apply for judicial review.

This article was first published in June 2022 and has been updated so that it is correct as of the new date of publication shown.