Updates, commentary, training and advice on immigration and asylum law
Californian “civil commitment” system a “flagrant breach” of ECHR Article 5
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
Hat tip to colleague Amanda Weston for this one. In The Government of the United States of America v Giese  EWHC 2733 (Admin) (07 October 2015) the High Court found in an extradition case that the “civil commitment” system operated by California in respect of sexual offenders who have served their sentence amounts to a flagrant breach of ECHR Article 5, the right to liberty. These orders cause a person to be detained for an indefinite period, subject to an annual review.
There was a real risk that Mr Giese would be convicted if extradited and that he would be subject to one of these commitment orders.
The extradition to the United States of Mr Giese, accused of some serious sexual offences against a boy below the age of 14, was therefore held to be unlawful.
Could be useful in human rights breach protection cases where there is a risk of very prolonged detention that does not form part of a criminal sentence.