- BY Colin Yeo
Choice of religious upbringing for child not a basis for international protection
THANKS FOR READING
Older content is locked
A great deal of time and effort goes into producing the information on Free Movement, become a member of Free Movement to get unlimited access to all articles, and much, much more
TAKE FREE MOVEMENT FURTHER
By becoming a member of Free Movement, you not only support the hard-work that goes into maintaining the website, but get access to premium features;
- Single login for personal use
- FREE downloads of Free Movement ebooks
- Access to all Free Movement blog content
- Access to all our online training materials
- Access to our busy forums
- Downloadable CPD certificates
In SS (Malaysia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 888 a child’s Christian mother had fled with the child from Malaysia after the father said he was to convert to Islam, fearing that their child would be brought up a Muslim not a Christian. The Court of Appeal rejected the argument that denial of the right to bring up one’s child in one’s own religion was a flagrant denial of the right to religion. It was in the child’s best interests to be brought up in his home country by both parents and it was for the courts of that country to settle any dispute between the parents. The court avoided the issue of whether male circumcision might ‘in some circumstances’ amount to a breach of a child’s human rights.
Interested in refugee law? You might like Colin's book, imaginatively called "Refugee Law" and published by Bristol University Press.
Communicating important legal concepts in an approachable way, this is an essential guide for students, lawyers and non-specialists alike.
SHARE
